Latest scan for each source
- Crossref
- PubMed / NCBI
- DOI recordsvia Crossref
- YouTube
Dates mark the latest recorded scan of each source. DOI records are checked through Crossref and share its scan date. Research is published separately after review.
Begin with the disciplines and investigation topics, then review the source inventory, update process, latest scan dates, and the limits of what “current” can mean.
Dates mark the latest recorded scan of each source. DOI records are checked through Crossref and share its scan date. Research is published separately after review.
A source can record a check date even when later screening or processing does not finish. This date identifies the latest full research run recorded as completed.
YouTube helps the app find relevant academic lectures, interviews, and discussions. The scan date shows when YouTube discovery ran. Videos are added to the research only after editorial review.
Claims are checked against original research and other appropriate sources before publication.
Publication dates identify reviewed changes added to the app. Individual evidence cards also show their own review dates.
Dates retrieved Oct 24, 2026, 3:32 AM. Discovery and publication are separate steps; database indexing can lag behind a paper's publication.
Each source has a defined role. Discovery services locate candidates; original sources establish claims; scholarly works provide interpretation; Faith Inquiry Press performs the synthesis.
DOI metadata, article titles, authors, journal names, publication dates, abstracts when supplied, and publisher links. The scheduled scout searches science, philosophy, religion, and theology; recorded check dates show when it actually ran, and the publisher record is checked before a claim is used.
Biomedical and life-science records used for human origins, genetics, cognition, suffering, and related evidence. Recorded check dates show when the scheduled source search actually ran; article type and peer-review status are verified separately.
Recent academic lectures, interviews, debates, and public discussions can be searched when the connection is enabled. Videos are discovery leads, not primary evidence, unless their underlying research can be independently verified.
Original papers, supplementary material, datasets, institutional repositories, and publisher corrections are treated as the authority for scientific claims. Retractions and material corrections override summaries.
Biblical passages, ancient texts, creeds, and original works by significant theologians and philosophers provide the basis for historical and interpretive discussion. Translation and interpretive choices are identified where they matter.
Commentaries, monographs, institutional resources, and scholarly overviews supply context and competing interpretations. These are distinguished from primary evidence and from the app's own conclusions.
Evidence maps, model comparisons, research reports, and app investigations synthesize the cited material. Member-shared discussion content remains within its selected group audience and does not become app-wide evidence without editorial approval.
The project is intentionally interdisciplinary. Scientific, biological, historical, philosophical, and theological claims are evaluated within their proper fields before conclusions are compared.
Empirical findings, measurement, model testing, dating methods, physical evidence, uncertainty, and reproducibility across the natural sciences.
Evolutionary biology, ancient DNA, population genetics, human ancestry, cognition, animal suffering, and origin-of-life research.
Hominin fossils, behavior, tools, fire, symbolic activity, migration, chronology, and reconstruction of human origins.
Cosmic expansion, the early universe, inflation, fine-tuning, physical beginnings, and the limits of scientific inference.
Creation, Adam and Eve, the image of God, the Fall, atonement, providence, revelation, suffering, and biblical interpretation.
Metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of religion, philosophy of mind, divine hiddenness, evil, Stoicism, Deism, and competing explanations.
Scripture, ancient sources, creeds, historical theology, original philosophical works, intellectual context, and translation questions.
Cognition, subjective experience, personhood, moral agency, animal minds, and the relationship between mind, brain, and theological anthropology.
The research scout is configured to search Crossref and PubMed across the nine investigation areas, with YouTube added when enabled. The source dates above show what actually ran. Direct matches enter a private screening queue; they do not appear automatically as conclusions.
The health job is configured to check research feeds, the pipeline, and recovery status hourly. Recorded run dates and admin alerts—not the schedule alone—show whether those checks actually completed.
An editor verifies the original source, evidence quality, limitations, affected claims, and competing interpretations. Approved changes are then published; there is no automatic publication interval.
Primary research and original documents carry more weight than summaries. Reference works provide context. Lectures, discussions, and shared resources can identify useful questions, but they are not treated as equivalent to primary or peer-reviewed evidence.