PUBLIC RESEARCH TRANSPARENCY

Research scope, sources, and currency.

Begin with the disciplines and investigation topics, then review the source inventory, update process, latest scan dates, and the limits of what “current” can mean.

RESEARCH CHECK DATES

When sources were checked and research was reviewed.

SOURCE SCAN DATES

Latest scan for each source

Crossref
PubMed / NCBI
DOI recordsvia Crossref
YouTube

Dates mark the latest recorded scan of each source. DOI records are checked through Crossref and share its scan date. Research is published separately after review.

FULL PIPELINE STATUS

Sep 21, 2026, 12:39 PM

Successful full run recorded

A source can record a check date even when later screening or processing does not finish. This date identifies the latest full research run recorded as completed.

HOW YOUTUBE IS USED

Lectures and discussions

YouTube helps the app find relevant academic lectures, interviews, and discussions. The scan date shows when YouTube discovery ran. Videos are added to the research only after editorial review.

Claims are checked against original research and other appropriate sources before publication.

MOST RECENT APPROVED UPDATE

Sep 10, 2026

Human reviewed

Publication dates identify reviewed changes added to the app. Individual evidence cards also show their own review dates.

Dates retrieved Oct 24, 2026, 3:32 AM. Discovery and publication are separate steps; database indexing can lag behind a paper's publication.

DETAILED SOURCE INVENTORY

What supplies the app's reference information.

Each source has a defined role. Discovery services locate candidates; original sources establish claims; scholarly works provide interpretation; Faith Inquiry Press performs the synthesis.

SCHEDULED SCHOLARLY INDEX

Crossref

Scheduled daily

DOI metadata, article titles, authors, journal names, publication dates, abstracts when supplied, and publisher links. The scheduled scout searches science, philosophy, religion, and theology; recorded check dates show when it actually ran, and the publisher record is checked before a claim is used.

SCHEDULED LIFE-SCIENCE INDEX

PubMed / NCBI

Scheduled daily

Biomedical and life-science records used for human origins, genetics, cognition, suffering, and related evidence. Recorded check dates show when the scheduled source search actually ran; article type and peer-review status are verified separately.

SCHEDULED DISCUSSION SIGNAL

YouTube Data API

Scheduled when enabled

Recent academic lectures, interviews, debates, and public discussions can be searched when the connection is enabled. Videos are discovery leads, not primary evidence, unless their underlying research can be independently verified.

PRIMARY SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE

Journal, DOI, dataset, and publisher records

During every editorial review

Original papers, supplementary material, datasets, institutional repositories, and publisher corrections are treated as the authority for scientific claims. Retractions and material corrections override summaries.

SCRIPTURE & HISTORICAL SOURCES

Biblical texts and primary historical works

When investigations are written or revised

Biblical passages, ancient texts, creeds, and original works by significant theologians and philosophers provide the basis for historical and interpretive discussion. Translation and interpretive choices are identified where they matter.

SCHOLARLY INTERPRETATION

Peer-reviewed studies, academic books, and reference works

During editorial review

Commentaries, monographs, institutional resources, and scholarly overviews supply context and competing interpretations. These are distinguished from primary evidence and from the app's own conclusions.

EDITORIAL SYNTHESIS

Faith Inquiry Press research

After documented review

Evidence maps, model comparisons, research reports, and app investigations synthesize the cited material. Member-shared discussion content remains within its selected group audience and does not become app-wide evidence without editorial approval.

TOPIC AREAS COVERED

The disciplines included in the research outline.

The project is intentionally interdisciplinary. Scientific, biological, historical, philosophical, and theological claims are evaluated within their proper fields before conclusions are compared.

01

Science

Empirical findings, measurement, model testing, dating methods, physical evidence, uncertainty, and reproducibility across the natural sciences.

02

Biology & Genetics

Evolutionary biology, ancient DNA, population genetics, human ancestry, cognition, animal suffering, and origin-of-life research.

03

Paleoanthropology & Archaeology

Hominin fossils, behavior, tools, fire, symbolic activity, migration, chronology, and reconstruction of human origins.

04

Cosmology & Physics

Cosmic expansion, the early universe, inflation, fine-tuning, physical beginnings, and the limits of scientific inference.

05

Theology & Biblical Studies

Creation, Adam and Eve, the image of God, the Fall, atonement, providence, revelation, suffering, and biblical interpretation.

06

Philosophy

Metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of religion, philosophy of mind, divine hiddenness, evil, Stoicism, Deism, and competing explanations.

07

History & Primary Texts

Scripture, ancient sources, creeds, historical theology, original philosophical works, intellectual context, and translation questions.

08

Neuroscience & Consciousness

Cognition, subjective experience, personhood, moral agency, animal minds, and the relationship between mind, brain, and theological anthropology.

NINE INVESTIGATION TOPICS

How each inquiry crosses the disciplines.

Human Origins & AdamBiology, genetics, paleoanthropology, archaeology, biblical studies, and theological anthropology
Death, Fall & AtonementEvolutionary biology, biblical theology, historical theology, and philosophy of religion
Divine HiddennessPhilosophy of religion, epistemology, psychology of belief, biblical studies, and theology
Cosmos & BeginningCosmology, physics, philosophy of science, metaphysics, and natural theology
Problem of EvilPhilosophy, ethics, theology, biblical studies, and the evidential assessment of suffering
Pre-Adam Animal SufferingEvolutionary biology, paleontology, animal cognition, ethics, theodicy, and eschatology
StoicismAncient philosophy, ethics, classical texts, history, natural theology, and human flourishing
DeismPhilosophy of religion, intellectual history, natural religion, providence, revelation, and metaphysics
Consciousness & PersonhoodNeuroscience, cognitive science, philosophy of mind, hominin cognition, ethics, and the image of God
SCHEDULED DAILY · 10:00 UTC

Automated discovery

The research scout is configured to search Crossref and PubMed across the nine investigation areas, with YouTube added when enabled. The source dates above show what actually ran. Direct matches enter a private screening queue; they do not appear automatically as conclusions.

SCHEDULED HOURLY · :15 PAST THE HOUR

Feed and pipeline health

The health job is configured to check research feeds, the pipeline, and recovery status hourly. Recorded run dates and admin alerts—not the schedule alone—show whether those checks actually completed.

AFTER HUMAN REVIEW

Publication and revision

An editor verifies the original source, evidence quality, limitations, affected claims, and competing interpretations. Approved changes are then published; there is no automatic publication interval.

WHAT “CURRENT” MEANS

Current discovery is not the same as instant completeness.

  • Source check dates and editorial review dates describe different stages of the research process.
  • The scan overlaps recent days to account for late-indexed records.
  • Published app content reflects the latest item that completed editorial review.
  • A newly released paper may not yet be indexed, reviewed, or incorporated.
  • AI-generated explanations can make mistakes and should be checked against the linked source.
Evidence is weighted, not merely collected.

Primary research and original documents carry more weight than summaries. Reference works provide context. Lectures, discussions, and shared resources can identify useful questions, but they are not treated as equivalent to primary or peer-reviewed evidence.

Return to About Faith Inquiry Press