Prepare from a clear evidence map.
Choose one investigation, review the strongest evidence cards, and note where the main views genuinely disagree. You do not need to master every source.
Faith Inquiry Navigator gives a church, ministry, class, or small-group leader a repeatable structure for difficult science-and-faith conversations while each participant keeps private questions and reflections private.
The demonstration stays on this page so you can evaluate the workflow without leaving the facilitator path.
Choose one investigation, review the strongest evidence cards, and note where the main views genuinely disagree. You do not need to master every source.
Make room for uncertainty, examine one claim, compare views fairly, locate the real disagreement, and end with one useful open question.
Shared discussion stays separate from each member’s private profile, confidence ratings, and AI conversations.
This is a suggested path, not a required curriculum order. Leaders can substitute any of the nine investigations.
Start with what genetics, fossils, and Scripture each can—and cannot—settle.
Ask what changed with human sin if biological death already existed.
Separate suffering caused by human choices from disease, disasters, and natural history.
Make room for honest doubt, unanswered prayer, and non-resistant unbelief.
Examine consciousness, Neanderthals, personhood, and the image of God.
Bring the evidence together without forcing the group into one conclusion.
This works for Christians, people with doubts, and mixed-belief groups. The leader keeps the discussion fair. Each person decides what they think.
What does human evolution show, and what questions about Adam and God’s image are still open?
Agree that anyone may pass, disagree, or leave a question open. Do not judge another person’s faith or motives.
Open one evidence card and its source. Ask: What does this show? What does it not prove? What are its limits?
Have someone explain a view fairly, even if they disagree with it. Keep science, history, philosophy, and theology separate when they are answering different questions.
Ask what people actually disagree about, which evidence matters most, and what new evidence could change their minds.
Each person may name one thing that became clearer, one question still open, or one source to check. Nobody has to share a private belief or score.
Before sharing: agree to respect privacy. Profile answers, confidence ratings, and AI chats stay private unless the person chooses to share them. A group discussion is never a test of loyalty.
Register your interest. Faith Inquiry Press can contact you about facilitator materials, pilot availability, and group-plan options. No testimonial or endorsement will be published without your explicit permission.